NBA Statement on Supreme Court Decision on Affirmative Action in Michigan

Based on this ruling, the court agrees that voters can strike down affirmative action initiatives which seek to provide opportunities for minorities in their states so that a certain class of citizens can continue to reap the majority of the benefits of education.

Justice Sotomayor, who was joined by Ginsburg in her dissent wrote, “This refusal to accept the stark reality that race matters is regrettable. The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to speak openly and candidly on the subject of race, and to apply the Constitution with eyes open to the unfortunate effects of centuries of racial discrimination.”

California, Florida, Texas, Arizona, Nebraska, Oklahoma and Washington have also passed voter based laws banning affirmative action in higher education admission decisions. Since the passage of these bans, schools located in these states have seen a drop in the admission of minority students.

At the University of Michigan’s flagship Ann Arbor campus, black enrollment dropped 30 percentafter the state’s affirmative action ban passed in 2006. At the campus’ law school, just 14 black students enrolled in 2008.  Enrollment numbers of black students has not risen since that time.

As we prepare to celebrate the 60^th Anniversary of the landmark Brown v. Board of Educationdecision, we are reminded that while our institutions are integrated we must continue our fight to ensure they remain that way.  Tuesday’s ruling becomes part of this country’s long and unfortunate racial discrimination.

We believe that affirmative action and pipeline programs help improve diversity in the legal profession and applaud Justice Sotomayor’s defense of affirmative action.

Patricia Rosier,
President, National Bar Association

Our mailing address is:

National Bar Association

1225 11th Street Northwest, Washington, DC

Washington, DC 20001